substitute the given feedback control law u = − 2 x ˙ 3 − 5 x ∣ x ∣ = − 2 x 2 3 − 5 x 1 ∣ x 1 ∣ u = -2\dot{x}^3 - 5x|x| = -2x_2^3 - 5x_1|x_1| u = − 2 x ˙ 3 − 5 x ∣ x ∣ = − 2 x 2 3 − 5 x 1 ∣ x 1 ∣ into the given system. Then get:
x ˙ 1 = x 2 x ˙ 2 = − a 1 x 2 3 − a 2 x 1 2 − 2 x 2 3 − 5 x 1 ∣ x 1 ∣ = − ( a 1 + 2 ) x 2 3 − a 2 x 1 2 − 5 x 1 ∣ x 1 ∣ \begin{aligned}
\dot{x}_1 &= x_2 \\
\dot{x}_2 &= -a_1 x_2^3 - a_2 x_1^2 - 2x_2^3 - 5x_1|x_1| \\
&= -(a_1 + 2)x_2^3 - a_2 x_1^2 - 5x_1|x_1|
\end{aligned} x ˙ 1 x ˙ 2 = x 2 = − a 1 x 2 3 − a 2 x 1 2 − 2 x 2 3 − 5 x 1 ∣ x 1 ∣ = − ( a 1 + 2 ) x 2 3 − a 2 x 1 2 − 5 x 1 ∣ x 1 ∣
let the Lyapunov function to be :
V ( x 1 , x 2 ) = ∫ 0 x 1 ( 5 s ∣ s ∣ + a 2 s 2 ) d s + a 1 + 2 4 x 2 4 V(x_1, x_2) = \int_0^{x_1} (5s|s| + a_2 s^2) \, ds + \frac{a_1 + 2}{4}x_2^4 V ( x 1 , x 2 ) = ∫ 0 x 1 ( 5 s ∣ s ∣ + a 2 s 2 ) d s + 4 a 1 + 2 x 2 4
since a 1 > − 2 , ∣ a 2 ∣ < 5 a_1 >-2, \quad |a_2| < 5 a 1 > − 2 , ∣ a 2 ∣ < 5 :
∫ 0 x 1 ( 5 s ∣ s ∣ + a 2 s 2 ) d s > 0 a 1 + 2 4 x 2 4 > 0 \int_0^{x_1} (5s|s| + a_2 s^2) \, ds >0 \\
\frac{a_1 + 2}{4}x_2^4 > 0 ∫ 0 x 1 ( 5 s ∣ s ∣ + a 2 s 2 ) d s > 0 4 a 1 + 2 x 2 4 > 0
V ( x 1 , x 2 ) V(x_1, x_2) V ( x 1 , x 2 ) is positive definite.
V ˙ ( x 1 , x 2 ) = ∂ V ∂ x 1 x ˙ 1 + ∂ V ∂ x 2 x ˙ 2 \dot{V}(x_1, x_2) = \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_1}\dot{x}_1 + \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_2}\dot{x}_2 V ˙ ( x 1 , x 2 ) = ∂ x 1 ∂ V x ˙ 1 + ∂ x 2 ∂ V x ˙ 2
∂ V ∂ x 1 = 5 x 1 ∣ x 1 ∣ + a 2 x 1 2 and ∂ V ∂ x 2 = x 2 \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_1} = 5x_1|x_1| + a_2 x_1^2 \quad \text{and} \quad \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_2} = x_2 ∂ x 1 ∂ V = 5 x 1 ∣ x 1 ∣ + a 2 x 1 2 and ∂ x 2 ∂ V = x 2
substitute x 2 ˙ \dot{x_2} x 2 ˙ :
V ˙ ( x 1 , x 2 ) = ( 5 x 1 ∣ x 1 ∣ + a 2 x 1 2 ) x 2 + x 2 [ − ( a 1 + 2 ) x 2 3 − a 2 x 1 2 − 5 x 1 ∣ x 1 ∣ ] \dot{V}(x_1, x_2) = (5x_1|x_1| + a_2 x_1^2)x_2 + x_2 \left[ -(a_1 + 2)x_2^3 - a_2 x_1^2 - 5x_1|x_1| \right] V ˙ ( x 1 , x 2 ) = ( 5 x 1 ∣ x 1 ∣ + a 2 x 1 2 ) x 2 + x 2 [ − ( a 1 + 2 ) x 2 3 − a 2 x 1 2 − 5 x 1 ∣ x 1 ∣ ]
which we get:
V ˙ ( x 1 , x 2 ) = − ( a 1 + 2 ) x 2 4 \dot{V}(x_1, x_2) = -(a_1 + 2)x_2^4 V ˙ ( x 1 , x 2 ) = − ( a 1 + 2 ) x 2 4
is negative semi- definite, it doesn’t depend on x 1 x_1 x 1 so it cana be 0, even wehen x 1 ≠ 0 x_1 \neq 0 x 1 = 0 . To prove asymptotic stability, we use LaSalle’s principle:
Set V ˙ ( x 1 , x 2 ) = 0 \dot{V}(x_1, x_2) = 0 V ˙ ( x 1 , x 2 ) = 0 , then x 2 = 0 x_2 = 0 x 2 = 0
Then x ˙ 2 = 0 \dot{x}_2 = 0 x ˙ 2 = 0
Then substitute into system dynamic:
5 x 1 ∣ x 1 ∣ + a 2 x 1 2 = 0 5x_1|x_1| + a_2 x_1^2 = 0 5 x 1 ∣ x 1 ∣ + a 2 x 1 2 = 0
solve for x 1 x_1 x 1 , then get x 1 = 0 x_1 = 0 x 1 = 0
Hence, the only trajectory that can stay indefinitely in the set where V ˙ = 0 \dot{V} = 0 V ˙ = 0 is the origion itself:
M = { ( 0 , 0 ) } M = \{(0, 0)\} M = {( 0 , 0 )}
Since V ( x 1 , x 2 ) V(x_1, x_2) V ( x 1 , x 2 ) is radially unbounded, positive definite, V ˙ ( x 1 , x 2 ) ≤ 0 \dot{V}(x_1, x_2) \leq 0 V ˙ ( x 1 , x 2 ) ≤ 0 and the largest inveriant set in V ˙ = 0 \dot{V} = 0 V ˙ = 0 is strically the origin (0,0), by LaSalle’s inveriant principle, the origin is globally asymptotically stable.
The candidate Lyapunove function is:
V ( t , x ) = x 1 2 + [ 1 + g ( t ) ] 2 x 2 2 V(t,x) = x_1^2 + [1+g(t)]^2x_2^2 V ( t , x ) = x 1 2 + [ 1 + g ( t ) ] 2 x 2 2
g ( t ) g(t) g ( t ) is bounded by 0 ≤ g ( t ) ≤ k 0 \leq g(t) \leq k 0 ≤ g ( t ) ≤ k ,
which means [ 1 + g ( t ) ] 2 [1+g(t)]^2 [ 1 + g ( t ) ] 2 is bounded between 1 and ( 1 + k ) 2 (1+k)^2 ( 1 + k ) 2 . Thus :
x 1 2 + x 2 2 ≤ V ( t , x ) ≤ ( 1 + k ) 2 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) x_1^2 + x_2^2 \leq V(t,x) \leq (1+k)^2(x_1^2 + x_2^2) x 1 2 + x 2 2 ≤ V ( t , x ) ≤ ( 1 + k ) 2 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 )
V ( t , x ) V(t,x) V ( t , x ) is positive definite and radially unbounded uniformly in t t t
is explicityly depends on time t through g ( t ) g(t) g ( t )
Differentiate V ( t , x ) V(t, x) V ( t , x ) with Respect to TimeSince V ( t , x ) V(t, x) V ( t , x ) explicitly depends on time t t t through g ( t ) g(t) g ( t ) :
V ˙ ( t , x ) = ∂ V ∂ t + ∂ V ∂ x 1 x ˙ 1 + ∂ V ∂ x 2 x ˙ 2 \dot{V}(t, x) = \frac{\partial V}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_1}\dot{x}_1 + \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_2}\dot{x}_2 V ˙ ( t , x ) = ∂ t ∂ V + ∂ x 1 ∂ V x ˙ 1 + ∂ x 2 ∂ V x ˙ 2
∂ V ∂ t = 2 [ 1 + g ( t ) ] g ˙ ( t ) x 2 2 \frac{\partial V}{\partial t} = 2[1 + g(t)]\dot{g}(t)x_2^2 ∂ t ∂ V = 2 [ 1 + g ( t )] g ˙ ( t ) x 2 2
∂ V ∂ x 1 = 2 x 1 \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_1} = 2x_1 ∂ x 1 ∂ V = 2 x 1
∂ V ∂ x 2 = 2 [ 1 + g ( t ) ] 2 x 2 \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_2} = 2[1 + g(t)]^2 x_2 ∂ x 2 ∂ V = 2 [ 1 + g ( t ) ] 2 x 2
and substitude the system equations into this formula:
V ˙ ( t , x ) = 2 [ 1 + g ( t ) ] g ˙ ( t ) x 2 2 + 2 x 1 ( − x 1 − g ( t ) x 2 ) + 2 [ 1 + g ( t ) ] 2 x 2 ( x 1 − x 2 ) \dot{V}(t, x) = 2[1 + g(t)]\dot{g}(t)x_2^2 + 2x_1\Big(-x_1 - g(t)x_2\Big) + 2[1 + g(t)]^2 x_2(x_1 - x_2) V ˙ ( t , x ) = 2 [ 1 + g ( t )] g ˙ ( t ) x 2 2 + 2 x 1 ( − x 1 − g ( t ) x 2 ) + 2 [ 1 + g ( t ) ] 2 x 2 ( x 1 − x 2 )
Since g ˙ ( t ) ≤ g ( t ) \dot{g}(t) \leq g(t) g ˙ ( t ) ≤ g ( t ) :
V ˙ ( t , x ) ≤ − 2 x 1 2 + 2 [ 1 + g ( t ) + g ( t ) 2 ] x 1 x 2 − 2 [ 1 + 2 g ( t ) + g ( t ) 2 ] x 2 2 + 2 [ g ( t ) + g ( t ) 2 ] x 2 2 \dot{V}(t, x) \leq -2x_1^2 + 2[1 + g(t) + g(t)^2]x_1x_2 - 2[1 + 2g(t) + g(t)^2]x_2^2 + 2[g(t) + g(t)^2]x_2^2 V ˙ ( t , x ) ≤ − 2 x 1 2 + 2 [ 1 + g ( t ) + g ( t ) 2 ] x 1 x 2 − 2 [ 1 + 2 g ( t ) + g ( t ) 2 ] x 2 2 + 2 [ g ( t ) + g ( t ) 2 ] x 2 2
V ˙ ( t , x ) ≤ − 2 x 1 2 + 2 [ 1 + g ( t ) + g ( t ) 2 ] x 1 x 2 − 2 [ 1 + g ( t ) ] x 2 2 \dot{V}(t, x) \leq -2x_1^2 + 2[1 + g(t) + g(t)^2]x_1x_2 - 2[1 + g(t)]x_2^2 V ˙ ( t , x ) ≤ − 2 x 1 2 + 2 [ 1 + g ( t ) + g ( t ) 2 ] x 1 x 2 − 2 [ 1 + g ( t )] x 2 2
V ˙ ( t , x ) ≤ − [ x 1 x 2 ] [ 2 − ( 1 + g ( t ) + g ( t ) 2 ) − ( 1 + g ( t ) + g ( t ) 2 ) 2 ( 1 + g ( t ) ) ] [ x 1 x 2 ] \dot{V}(t, x) \leq -\begin{bmatrix} x_1 & x_2 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} 2 & -(1 + g(t) + g(t)^2) \\ -(1 + g(t) + g(t)^2) & 2(1 + g(t)) \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{bmatrix} V ˙ ( t , x ) ≤ − [ x 1 x 2 ] [ 2 − ( 1 + g ( t ) + g ( t ) 2 ) − ( 1 + g ( t ) + g ( t ) 2 ) 2 ( 1 + g ( t )) ] [ x 1 x 2 ]
The matrix Q ( t ) Q(t) Q ( t ) must be uniformly positive definite, so that V ˙ ( t , x ) \dot{V}(t,x) V ˙ ( t , x ) to be strictly negative definite uniformly. By using Sylvester’s Criterion:
first minor: 2 > 0
Determinant of Q ( t ) Q(t) Q ( t ) :
det ( Q ( t ) ) = 4 + 4 g ( t ) − [ 1 + g ( t ) + g ( t ) 2 ] 2 \det(Q(t)) = 4 + 4g(t) - \left[1 + g(t) + g(t)^2\right]^2 det ( Q ( t )) = 4 + 4 g ( t ) − [ 1 + g ( t ) + g ( t ) 2 ] 2
if g ( t ) → 0 g(t) \rightarrow 0 g ( t ) → 0 , det ( Q ( t ) ) = 3 \det(Q(t)) = 3 det ( Q ( t )) = 3 , when det ( Q ) = 0 \det(Q) = 0 det ( Q ) = 0 , 1 + g ( t ) + g ( t ) 2 = 4 + 4 g ( t ) 1 + g(t) + g(t)^2 = \sqrt{4+4g(t)} 1 + g ( t ) + g ( t ) 2 = 4 + 4 g ( t ) , V ˙ ( t , x ) \dot{V}(t,x) V ˙ ( t , x ) is negative definite. g ( t ) g(t) g ( t ) is solved to be around 0.58, so if k < 0.58 k <0.58 k < 0.58 , exists c 3 c_3 c 3 to have
c 3 = ( 4 + 2 k ) − ( 4 + 2 k ) 2 − 4 [ 4 + 4 k − ( 1 + k + k 2 ) 2 ] 2 c_3 = \frac{(4 + 2k) - \sqrt{(4 + 2k)^2 - 4\left[4 + 4k - (1 + k + k^2)^2\right]}}{2} c 3 = 2 ( 4 + 2 k ) − ( 4 + 2 k ) 2 − 4 [ 4 + 4 k − ( 1 + k + k 2 ) 2 ]
V ˙ ( t , x ) ≤ − c 3 ∥ x ∥ 2 2 = − c 3 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) \dot{V}(t,x) \leq -c_3 \|x\|_2^2 = -c_3 (x_1^2 + x_2^2) V ˙ ( t , x ) ≤ − c 3 ∥ x ∥ 2 2 = − c 3 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 )
V ˙ ≤ − c 3 ( 1 + k ) 2 V \dot{V} \leq -\frac{c_3}{(1+k)^2} V V ˙ ≤ − ( 1 + k ) 2 c 3 V
integral this formula, then get:
V ( t , x ( t ) ) ≤ V ( 0 , x ( 0 ) ) ⋅ e − c 3 ( 1 + k ) 2 t V(t, x(t)) \leq V(0, x(0)) \cdot e^{-\frac{c_3}{(1+k)^2} t} V ( t , x ( t )) ≤ V ( 0 , x ( 0 )) ⋅ e − ( 1 + k ) 2 c 3 t
θ ¨ + θ ˙ + 0.5 θ = 0 \ddot{\theta}+\dot{\theta} + 0.5\theta = 0 θ ¨ + θ ˙ + 0.5 θ = 0
x ˙ 1 = x 2 x ˙ 2 = − 0.5 x 1 − x 2 \dot{x}_1 = x_2 \quad \dot{x}_2 = -0.5x_1-x_2 x ˙ 1 = x 2 x ˙ 2 = − 0.5 x 1 − x 2
[ x ˙ 1 x ˙ 2 ] = [ 0 1 − 0.5 − 1 ] [ x 1 x 2 ] \begin{bmatrix} \dot{x}_1 \\ \dot{x}_2 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ -0.5 & -1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{bmatrix} [ x ˙ 1 x ˙ 2 ] = [ 0 − 0.5 1 − 1 ] [ x 1 x 2 ]
Equilibrium point: x = ( 0 , 0 ) x = (0,0) x = ( 0 , 0 )
LTI: det ( λ I − A ) = 0 \det(\lambda I - A) = 0 det ( λ I − A ) = 0
det [ λ − 1 0.5 λ + 1 ] = λ 2 + λ + 0.5 = 0 \det \begin{bmatrix} \lambda & -1 \\ 0.5 & \lambda + 1 \end{bmatrix} = \lambda^2 + \lambda + 0.5 = 0 det [ λ 0.5 − 1 λ + 1 ] = λ 2 + λ + 0.5 = 0
eigenvalues are:
λ 1 , 2 = − 0.5 ± 0.5 i \lambda_{1,2} = -0.5 \pm 0.5i λ 1 , 2 = − 0.5 ± 0.5 i , on left plane, Stable focus.
θ ¨ + θ ˙ + 0.5 θ = 1 \ddot{\theta} + \dot{\theta} + 0.5\,\theta = 1 θ ¨ + θ ˙ + 0.5 θ = 1
x ˙ 1 = x 2 x ˙ 2 = − 0.5 x 1 − x 2 + 1 \begin{aligned}
\dot{x}_1 &= x_2 \
\dot{x}_2 &= -0.5x_1 - x_2 + 1
\end{aligned} x ˙ 1 = x 2 x ˙ 2 = − 0.5 x 1 − x 2 + 1
[ x ˙ 1 x ˙ 2 ] = [ 0 1 − 0.5 − 1 ] [ x 1 x 2 ] + [ 0 1 ] ⋅ 1 \begin{bmatrix} \dot{x}_1 \\ \dot{x}_2 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ -0.5 & -1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{bmatrix} + \begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} \cdot 1 [ x ˙ 1 x ˙ 2 ] = [ 0 − 0.5 1 − 1 ] [ x 1 x 2 ] + [ 0 1 ] ⋅ 1
Equilibrium point: x = ( 2 , 0 ) x = (2,0) x = ( 2 , 0 )
LTI: same with above.
θ ¨ + ( θ ˙ ) 2 + 0.5 θ = 0 \ddot{\theta} + (\dot{\theta})^2 + 0.5\,\theta = 0 θ ¨ + ( θ ˙ ) 2 + 0.5 θ = 0
θ ¨ = − 0.5 θ − ( θ ˙ ) 2 \ddot{\theta} = -0.5\,\theta - (\dot{\theta})^2 θ ¨ = − 0.5 θ − ( θ ˙ ) 2
x ˙ 1 = x 2 x ˙ 2 = − 0.5 x 1 − x 2 2 \begin{aligned}
\dot{x}_1 &= x_2 \
\dot{x}_2 &= -0.5x_1 - x_2^2
\end{aligned} x ˙ 1 = x 2 x ˙ 2 = − 0.5 x 1 − x 2 2
Equilibrium point: x = ( 0 , 0 ) x = (0,0) x = ( 0 , 0 )
Calculate teh Jacobian around equilibrium:
A = [ 0 1 − 0.5 0 ] A = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\-0.5 & 0
\end{bmatrix} A = [ 0 − 0.5 1 0 ]
Eigenvalues are
λ 1 , 2 = ± 0.5 i = ± 0.707 i \lambda_{1,2} = \pm \sqrt{0.5}i = \pm 0.707i λ 1 , 2 = ± 0.5 i = ± 0.707 i
Real part is zero, so it’s not possible to determine locally stability from linearization.
V ( x 1 , x 2 ) = 0.25 x 1 2 + 0.5 x 2 2 V(x_1, x_2) = 0.25x_1^2 + 0.5x_2^2 V ( x 1 , x 2 ) = 0.25 x 1 2 + 0.5 x 2 2
V ˙ = ∂ V ∂ x 1 x ˙ 1 + ∂ V ∂ x 2 x ˙ 2 = − x 2 3 \begin{align*}
\dot{V} &= \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_1}\dot{x}_1 + \frac{\partial V}{\partial x_2}\dot{x}_2 \\
&= -x_2^3
\end{align*} V ˙ = ∂ x 1 ∂ V x ˙ 1 + ∂ x 2 ∂ V x ˙ 2 = − x 2 3
x 2 < 0 x_2 < 0 x 2 < 0 ,V ˙ = − x 2 3 > 0 \dot{V} = -x_2^3 > 0 V ˙ = − x 2 3 > 0 , the total energy is increasing, by using LaSalle’s Principle, it’s not asymptically stable.
Poential energy is
V ( q ) = m 1 g 0 r 1 sin q 1 + m 2 g 0 ( q 2 + r 2 ) sin ( q 1 ) V(q) = m_1 g_0 r_1 \sin{q_1} + m_2 g_0 (q_2+r_2)\sin(q_1) V ( q ) = m 1 g 0 r 1 sin q 1 + m 2 g 0 ( q 2 + r 2 ) sin ( q 1 )
g ( q ) = ∂ V ∂ q g(q) = \frac{\partial V}{\partial q} g ( q ) = ∂ q ∂ V
g ( q ) = [ ( m 1 g 0 r 1 + m 2 g 0 ( q 2 + r 2 ) ) cos q 1 m 2 g 0 sin q 1 ] g(q) = \begin{bmatrix} (m_1 g_0 r_1+ m_2 g_0 (q_2+r_2)) \cos q_1 \\
m_2 g_0 \sin q_1
\end{bmatrix} g ( q ) = [ ( m 1 g 0 r 1 + m 2 g 0 ( q 2 + r 2 )) cos q 1 m 2 g 0 sin q 1 ]
∂ g ( q ) ∂ q = [ − ( m 1 g 0 r 1 + m 2 g 0 ( q 2 + r 2 ) ) sin q 1 m 2 g 0 cos q 1 m 2 g 0 cos q 1 0 ] = [ − α sin q 1 b cos q 1 b cos q 1 0 ] \frac{\partial g(q)}{\partial q} =
\begin{bmatrix} -(m_1 g_0 r_1+ m_2 g_0 (q_2+r_2)) \sin q_1 & m_2 g_0 \cos q_1\\
m_2 g_0 \cos q_1 & 0
\end{bmatrix}
=
\begin{bmatrix} -\alpha \sin q_1 & b \cos q_1\\
b \cos q_1 & 0
\end{bmatrix} ∂ q ∂ g ( q ) = [ − ( m 1 g 0 r 1 + m 2 g 0 ( q 2 + r 2 )) sin q 1 m 2 g 0 cos q 1 m 2 g 0 cos q 1 0 ] = [ − α sin q 1 b cos q 1 b cos q 1 0 ]
where define α = m 1 g r 1 + m 2 g ( q 2 + r 2 ) b = m 2 g 0 \alpha = m_1 g r_1+m_2 g (q_2 + r_2)\quad b = m_2g_0 α = m 1 g r 1 + m 2 g ( q 2 + r 2 ) b = m 2 g 0
∣ ∣ ∂ g ( q ) ∂ q ∣ ∣ 2 = λ m a x ( J T J ) ||\frac{\partial g(q)}{\partial q}||_2 = \sqrt{\lambda_{max}(J^TJ)} ∣∣ ∂ q ∂ g ( q ) ∣ ∣ 2 = λ ma x ( J T J )
λ m a x = 1 / 2 ∗ ( a 2 sin 2 q 1 + 2 b 2 cos 2 q 1 + ∣ a sin q 1 ∣ a 2 sin 2 q 1 + 4 b 2 cos 2 q 1 ) \lambda_{max} = 1/2 * (a^2 \sin^2 q_1 +2b^2\cos^2q_1 + |a \sin q_1|\sqrt{a^2 \sin^2 q_1 + 4b^2 \cos^2 q_1}) λ ma x = 1/2 ∗ ( a 2 sin 2 q 1 + 2 b 2 cos 2 q 1 + ∣ a sin q 1 ∣ a 2 sin 2 q 1 + 4 b 2 cos 2 q 1 )
a ˉ 2 sin 2 ( q 1 ) + 2 b 2 cos 2 ( q 1 ) ≤ a ˉ 2 ( 1 ) + 2 b 2 ( 1 ) = a ˉ 2 + 2 b 2 \bar{a}^2 \sin^2(q_1) + 2b^2 \cos^2(q_1) \leq \bar{a}^2 (1) + 2b^2 (1) = \bar{a}^2 + 2b^2 a ˉ 2 sin 2 ( q 1 ) + 2 b 2 cos 2 ( q 1 ) ≤ a ˉ 2 ( 1 ) + 2 b 2 ( 1 ) = a ˉ 2 + 2 b 2
a ˉ 2 sin 2 ( q 1 ) + 4 b 2 cos 2 ( q 1 ) ≤ a ˉ 2 ( 1 ) + 4 b 2 ( 1 ) = a ˉ 2 + 4 b 2 \sqrt{\bar{a}^2 \sin^2(q_1) + 4b^2 \cos^2(q_1)} \leq \sqrt{\bar{a}^2 (1) + 4b^2 (1)} = \sqrt{\bar{a}^2 + 4b^2} a ˉ 2 sin 2 ( q 1 ) + 4 b 2 cos 2 ( q 1 ) ≤ a ˉ 2 ( 1 ) + 4 b 2 ( 1 ) = a ˉ 2 + 4 b 2
λ max ≤ 1 2 ( a ˉ 2 + 2 b 2 + a ˉ a ˉ 2 + 4 b 2 ) \lambda_{\max} \leq \frac{1}{2} \left( \bar{a}^2 + 2b^2 + \bar{a} \sqrt{\bar{a}^2 + 4b^2} \right) λ m a x ≤ 2 1 ( a ˉ 2 + 2 b 2 + a ˉ a ˉ 2 + 4 b 2 )
then we get:
α = 1 2 ( a ˉ 2 + 2 b 2 + a ˉ a ˉ 2 + 4 b 2 ) \alpha = \sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left( \bar{a}^2 + 2b^2 + \bar{a} \sqrt{\bar{a}^2 + 4b^2} \right)} α = 2 1 ( a ˉ 2 + 2 b 2 + a ˉ a ˉ 2 + 4 b 2 )
where,
a ˉ = g 0 ( m 1 r 1 + m 2 ( L + r 2 ) ) \bar{a} = g_0(m_1 r_1 + m_2 (L + r_2)) a ˉ = g 0 ( m 1 r 1 + m 2 ( L + r 2 ))
b = g 0 m 2 b = g_0 m_2 b = g 0 m 2